Dear Cardinals: I know when I’ve been insulted

Nattering Naybob: I know this complaint is a little late, but another Papal election has come and gone and the so-called Cardinals have again failed to elect me to the Papalcy on a write-in basis. Can you imagine they instead voted for some person who doesn’t even take advantage of his newly-available Papal limousine and instead hitches a ride back from the Vatican in a lowly VAN, with the rest of the Cardinals? What kind of a “Catholic” is he? Next thing you know the new so-called “Pope” will sell of some of the paintings and gold statuary that is in the Vatican to help raise cash to continue paying off the victims of decades on Church-enabled pedophillia, rather than ask for increasing donations from old widows in shawls who already give a big chunk of their Social Security checks to the Church.

If they had elected me I would have acted like a real Pope should, or at least HAS over the past thirty or so years, that is ignore all bad news and credible reports of criminal and financial malfeasance, and focus on the real issues such as the evils of birth control and the audacity of those disrespectful women wanting to be priests. Just let me ride in that Pope-mobile and I’ll keep my mouth shut…. man, you could LIVE in that thing it’s so big.

And who ever heard of a Pope from a Latin American country anyway? Next thing you know they’ll be electing Popes from Africa. As Archie Bunker would say, “Aw, Geez!”

The Red Ranger: I too was surprised that you were not elected, however, I think the biggest negative against you is your age.  I believe the job requirements for the Pope say you must be 70 years old.   If the Catholic church wants to get into the 21st century I think they need to spice up the selection process a little.  Maybe a Pope Survivor or Pope Idol contest to select the new Pope.

As you know I am not Catholic and not a very religious person, however, I am getting tired of everyone belittling the Catholic church and its beliefs.  If you choose not to follow the Catholic religion or any other religion then that is fine just allow those who believe in it to do so as they choose.   No one truly knows which religion is right or wrong or whether having no religion at all is the best approach.  So we are all just going to have to live with each other.

As far as the Pope-mobile goes that is one sweet ride.  I wonder if they have gone green with it yet.

Nattering Naybob: You have a fair point about the members of a religion having to abide by all the tenets of that religion, or leave the religion. However I believe that any enterprise or organization, whether a religion, a business, a governmental institution, or whatever, needs to grow with the times and allow its followers to speak their minds about the way that enterprise is run. What the Catholic church has forgotten is that the person responsible for the Catholic church’s existence, and Christianity as whole– that would be Jesus Christ– eschewed all material comforts and focused all his energy on tending to all people, nout just those whose appearance, behavior, and gender met his approval. I think it is ludicrous that the Catholic Church steadfastly refuses to allow women to become priests, or even to rise to the positon of deacon. What qualities or traits that are specific to males, make them uniquely and exclusively qualified to be priests?

I also think that the Catholic church should sell off every artifact and piece of gold decoration that adorns any of its churches or cathedral throughout the world, and use the money to tend to issues and practices that are more in keeping with Jesus Christ.

The Red Ranger: I agree wholeheartedly with your last point.  What is the reason for having an ornately decorated church or cathedral and to your point isn’t that in direct contrast with what Jesus Christ would have wanted.

I am not so sure about letting women become priests.  Not that I have anything against that personally but what I fear happening is that the church would then be molding its beliefs to fit the current environment to maintain membership and its continuing existence.  However, all the while as these seemingly small and innocuous changes are taking place over time the church becomes a shell of its former self and unrecognizable to its original beliefs.

So would a lesbian priest be in fitting with the Catholic gospel.  Not being Catholic I cannot answer that but to me it seems that this would be straying far afield from its teachings.

Personally, I would rather see the church stick to its guns and fight the attempts to make it into something that it is not.  Again not being Catholic that is easy for me to say.

On a different but related topic, a few years ago when Margaret and I and the boys were driving back from NJ on Easter after spending some time at my mother’s we realized that we did not have anything at home for Easter dinner.  We thought OK we would just pick something up at the supermarket when we got to MA.  However, when we got to MA near our home all of the supermarkets were closed.  Now this year Margaret and I both noticed that the supermarkets and many other stores were open on Easter.

Nattering Naybob: I don’t see what impact lesbian priests would have since 1) the official policy of the Catholic church is to mandate that their priests be celibate and 2) it is an open secret that many Catholic priests are gay, if not in practice, then in orientation. I do not feel as strongly about abolishing celibacy as I do about allowing owmen to be priests. I am not virulently against abolishing celibacy nor am I enthusiastially in favor of it. I also do not lend any credence to the theory that there would be less child molestation committed by the clergy if the ban on celibacy had been lifted, or was in effect. Sexual predation such as molestation and rape, whether heterosexual, homosexual, underage, or of age, are not sexual acts but acts of crime and abuse of power and probably about eighteen other negative and horrific traits.

Funny about Easter, my observations were in some ways similar but other ways different. In my view, Easter has surpassed Christmas as a Holiday in which the secular has overtaken the religious. You hear virtually nothing about what Easter really means, instead there is only talk of bunnies, Easter Egg rolls and hunts, and spring “Easter” breaks. On the other hand, and in contrast to your experience, I never realized that many stores closed on Easter Sunday until this year. So I noticed the opposite what you did. When you were able to find an open store that could give you some sustenance, did you admonish the store manager for staying open on Easter thereby doing his part to promote the War on Easter… while loading your shopping bags with meatloaf, cake, potato chips, and marshmallow Peeps?

Kentucky Senate race

The Red Ranger: I was disappointed to see that Ashley Judd is not going to be running for the Senate from Tennessee, sorry Kentucky.  I was looking forward to seeing her face on the news every night.  Sure beats seeing Nancy Pelosi or Hillary Clinton.

As much as I disagree with her viewpoints on most issues she would have made the race interesting with her frequent controversial and illogical comments.

Nattering Naybob: Yes, it would have been an interesting contrast, on the one hand you would have had Ashley Judd and on the other, Mitch McConnell, who looks like those well-preserved Pharoah mummies that the Egyptian guy with the hat always uncovers on the Discovery Channel.

I think it’s safe to say that if Ashely Judd would have run, and somehow would have won, if she had at some point served under a Republican president, she would not have made her main legislative goal to be the defeat of that opposite-party president, as McConnell stated was his goal following Obama’s first election.

Yankee talk

The Red Ranger: The Red Ranger Family  is heading out to California in early August . I have already ordered tickets to see the Angels vs. the Blue Jays on August 4th.  Got a deal 4 tickets, 4 hot dogs and 4 small sodas for only $81.95.   I think that would get you a bleacher seat at Yankee Stadium.  We may also try to take in a Dodgers game if the timing works out.

I wish I had time to work in a trip to NY for a Yankee game.

Nattering Naybob: It would probably get you the bleacher seat that has the blocked view. They probably call it “discounted partial view” seating. See below image. Gives new meaning to the phrase “half game out”.

stadium_obstructed

The Red Ranger: Not an inspiring start to the season yesterday for the Yankees.  They have a pretty weak lineup.  Remember the days when we used to go to opening day.  At least the weather was warmer yesterday.  I would not want to be sitting outside today.

I was actually down in New Jersey for a quick trip this past weekend for my fantasy baseball draft on Saturday.  Somehow I ended up with a lot of Cleveland Indians on my team (Nick Swisher is one of them).

Nattering Naybob: I watched the game yesterday on my computer at work and as usual, CC Sabathia gave up 4 runs in the early innings of a big game. By the time it was over, I think there were less than 5,000 people left in the stands. In his post-game press conference, Joe Girardi was asked about that and he said, “Well, I can understand parents wanting to get home early because it is a school night”. Excuse me?! The game got over about 4:30.

While admitting it is difficult to gauge this while watching TV, there was not the same buzz as in past years for Opening Day. About the only excitement in the pre-game activities was when Mariano Rivera was introduced. Somehow the promotion of the Yankee “brand” has sucked a lot of the genuine, old-fashioned excitement out of watching the Yankees. I agree with you, it was more exciting when we used to attend games back in the 1980’s and early 90’s even though the teams were not that good.

The Red Ranger: I wonder if we are just getting older and less excitable.  I hope there are a bunch of late 20 year-old folks who have the same level of excitement and anticipation that you and I used to have for opening day.  However, I tend to doubt that since I don’t think the younger generation has the same affinity for their local teams as we had.  Too much national coverage of sports events.  Kids can basically watch any team at any time whereas we only had the local teams to watch.